I have been asked by Giacomo Pailli, Università degli Studi, Florence, to spread the word about this study on the service of documents. Good luck with it!
The EU Commission has recently launched a European-wide study on the service of documents in EU Member States, which is being carried out by a consortium composed by the University of Florence, the University of Uppsala and DMI, a French consulting firm.
The Commission is particularly interested in understanding the existing disparities between the national regimes on service of documents that might constitute an obstacle to the proper functioning of Regulation 1393/2007 on the service of documents. The focus of the study is on domestic service of documents.
Anyone who works in the field of civil procedure, private international law and international litigation in general–either as private practitioners, in-house counsel, legal academics or neutrals– and has knowledge of how service of documents works in a EU Member State is invited to participate to the study by answering to an online questionnaire. On the website of the project you may also find the questionnaire translated in almost all languages of EU Member States.
The questionnaire is complex and articulated, but participants are free to answer only some of the sections, especially those that relate more closely to their direct experience or knowledge. The answers are all collected anonymously, unless the participant wish to be included in the public list of contributors to the study and answers question no. 1.5.
The survey will remain open until July 7th, 2015.
We warmly thank anyone who will take the time to ensure the success of this study.
Non renvoyée au Conseil constitutionnel
Non renvoyée au Conseil constitutionnel
Non renvoyée au Conseil constitutionnel
Non renvoyée au Conseil constitutionnel
Non renvoyée au Conseil constitutionnel
Non renvoyée au Conseil constitutionnel
Non renvoyée au Conseil constitutionnel
Non renvoyée au Conseil constitutionnel
Non renvoyée au Conseil constitutionnel
Non renvoyée au Conseil constitutionnel
Non renvoyée au Conseil constitutionnel
Non renvoyée au Conseil constitutionnel
Non renvoyée au Conseil constitutionnel
Joanna Jemielniak, Legal Interpretation in International Commercial Arbitration, Ashgate Publishing, 2014, ISBN 9781409447191, pp. 278, GBP 63.
[Dal sito dell’editore] – This book fills a gap in legal academic study and practice in International Commercial Arbitration (ICA) by offering an in-depth analysis on legal discourse and interpretation. Written by a specialist in international business law, arbitration and legal theory, it examines the discursive framework of arbitral proceedings, through an exploration of the unique status of arbitration as a legal and semiotic phenomenon. Historical and contemporary aspects of legal discourse and interpretation are considered, as well as developments in the field of discourse analysis in ICA. A section is devoted to institutional and structural determinants of legal discourse in ICA in which ad hoc and institutional forms are examined. The book also deals with functional aspects of legal interpretation in arbitral discourse, focusing on interpretative standards, methods and considerations in decision-making in ICA.
Ulteriori informazioni sono disponibili qui.
La cour d’appel de Paris a rendu hier sa décision dans l’affaire dite des « contrôles au faciès », dans laquelle 13 personnes, estimant avoir été victimes de contrôles d’identité discriminatoires en raison de leur couleur de peau, avaient engagé la responsabilité de l’État (lire notre article).
En carrousel matière: NonDès le 1er juillet 2015, un nouveau règlement de procédure du Tribunal ainsi que des textes d’application (dispositions pratiques d’exécution du règlement, formulaire d’aide juridictionnelle, aide-mémoire) entreront en vigueur.
En carrousel matière: OuiNon renvoyée au Conseil constitutionnel
Non renvoyée au Conseil constitutionnel
Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer